Threat Modelling
Working out what an attacker would actually go for, early enough that the answer can still change the design.
Security as a property of the system, not a review at the end.
THREAT MODELLINGREVIEWCRYPTOGRAPHYACCESS
Working out what an attacker would actually go for, early enough that the answer can still change the design.
Authentication, authorization, secrets and cryptography built in as the system is written — as in Mindora, where journal content is encrypted at rest and two-factor authentication is built in.
Reading a codebase and its configuration for the failures that automated scanning does not find, and reporting them with a fix.
Mapping a system against the controls a framework expects and closing the gaps. Alignment work — not certification, which only an accredited auditor can issue.
No, and no engineering firm should claim to. We do compliance alignment: mapping a system against the controls a framework expects and closing the gaps. Certification is issued only by an accredited auditor.
Failures in logic and configuration: authorization checks missing on one path, secrets exposed through a setting, flows an attacker can misuse. Each finding is reported with a fix, not just a severity.
With cryptography and access control designed in. In Mindora, journal content is encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM, passwords are stored as bcrypt hashes, and two-factor authentication is available to every account.
Tell us what you're trying to build, automate, or transform.